The sentinel service offers "Proof of Existence" for any and all digital objects and their creators, via the generation of a sentinel provider, Proof Certificate.
The service is offered by independent service providers, who produce a "SealToken" for each submitted digital object, and seals the object within a continuum of space-time ticks. The Seal Certified both the object and its binding to the "Creator" of the work, with non-repudiation functionality.
The Sentinel will also provide a "Proof Certificate" bound to each submitted "SealToken", the Proof Certificate represents a fully decentralised proof which can be exercised without the need to trust the Sentinel or any Sentinel involvement.
Axiom: The Certificate binds the digital object, to a legal jurisdiction, within a unique space-time context to the physical world.
The Proof Certificate proves the digital object existed at the Sentinel Tick Period (sequential point in time) it was sealed, proofs can be verified without reliance on a trusted third party.
The idea of timestamping information to verifiably establish a time at which a object existed is not new. For digital data, trusted timestamping protocols, which rely on asymmetric cryptography, are used to prove that data has existed and has remained unaltered since a certain point in time (Haber and Stornetta, 1991, Schneier, 1996). These techniques all relay upon a universal and centralised trusted absolute source of time, which is problematic and technically impossible to achieve. The sentinel service does not rely upon a trusted time source or even seek to establish a globally unique absolute "time" context for a digital object. Its seeks to establish a space-time or of precedence, which can prove that one digital object existed with a proven temporal relationship to another digital object in the same space-time continuum.
Trusted timestamping processes are specified in RFC 361 and the ANSI ASC X9.95 (Diagram to the Left). Initially, the original data is hashed. Hashing authenticates the exact data content, because the hash function ensures that changing a single bit in the data would generate a different hash value. The hash is then transmitted to a TSA, which joins the hash with a plain text timestamp. The resulting string, i.e. the hash combined with the timestamp, is hashed once more and digitally signed using the TSA’s private key. The resulting ciphertext represents the trusted timestamp, which, together with the plain text timestamp, is returned to the requester.
The need for a central TSA is a weakness of all timestamping approaches, since the integrity of the timestamping process is inevitably bound to the integrity of the TSA (Adams et al., 2001). If the TSA is compromised, all issued timestamps can become invalid given the TSA employs public key encryption using a single private key.
Protocols for decentralized trusted timestamping, in which multiple parties validate timestamps, significantly increase security (Haber and Stornetta, 1991). The sentinel service that enables users to anonymously create persistent, tamper-proof timestamps without relying on a centralized trusted global source of absolute time and a trusted timestamping authority.
The Sentinel Vault is a non custodial service, all vaulted digital objects are possessed and exclusively owned by the individual. The Sentinel Vault provides the vaulting service at the boundary between the physical world and the digital world. The Sentinel Vault has no independent access to the vaulted object, or asserts any rights over a vaulted digital object, these remain exclusively with the digital object owner.
All access to the vaulted digital object is via the traditional "two key" container arrangement, both the "owner" key and the "vault" key must be present to open any vaulted container.
Given the absolute binary nature of the vault technologies, a digital object owner can subscribe to an optional Key Recovery service; where a copy of the digital object access key, is securely stored via a FIPS 140-2 level 3 HSM, as part of a digital object disaster recovery plan.
Once vaulted by the creator of the original digital object, the digital object cannot leave the vault container. While a perfect digital copy can be made of the contained digital object by the current owner, the original work, remains exclusively within the secured boundary of the vault. Hence it is possible to always legally distinguish the original from any and any and all copies. The original digital object is possessed, with legal title, by the current owner as contained within the vault container.
Defined by the thirteenth International Conference on Data Engineering as a concept, which uncover the inherent schema(s) in semi-structured, hierarchical data sources and provide a concise description of the structure of the data, and can be stored detached from the data itself. The representative object can be proven to no be the object, but rather a cognitive representation of the object it represents. Possession of a represented object provides has no rights to the represented object. Representative objects exist to presentative objects in order to make discovery efficient and facilitate the generation of meaningful queries over the associated data object.
The Sentinel Vault service, is the pathway to legal codification via legal dematerialisation of digital objects. The first step in all sovereign dematerialisation laws is immobilisation. The sentinel vault provides legally codified immobilisation of any digital object, with non-repudiation of possession and ownership..
The Sentinel Vault affords legal immobilisation of any digital object, and hence digital objects can now be subject to real world possession, ownership and the bundle of associated rights. This is achived via the transformation of rights of ones labour into a commodity and hence capbale of immobalisation as a digital tangible commodity or digital object.
The Sentinel Vault gives practical effect to property right to which the digital object is to be subjected to: (i) what exactly is the property object (the res, or its reification in a given concrete example), (ii) what is the content of the real right in relation to the data object (iii) who is the property right allocated to (iv) how can this allocation be changed, that is, how can ownership in the data object be transferred.
The Sentinel Vault Infrastructure is operated by independent private providers, in no case does the vault service provide any form of custody over any digital objects, the current owner has legal title to digital objects within the physically possessed vaulted container.
All real rights, particularly the most extensive and most important one, ownership, can be analysed as having an internal side (broadly, the right to use) and an external side (broadly, the right to exclude). In a digital world property is not primarily a connection between a person and an object, but a legal relationship between persons with regard to things. The law determines what this proprietary relationship consists of, by essentially ordering a specific behavior towards persons in respect of things which makes them ‘their’ things.
This is commonly referred to as the property right (or ‘real right’), the subjective exclusive right to a res, enforceable rights‘ a property right binds the world, different from, and independent of, an underlying contractual relationship that would only bind the contracting parties. The property right of ownership, being the most extensive property right, is enforced by the owner against all others. Thus ‘property’ is the creature of the law; there are no ‘natural’ property rights'.
Whether a thing can be possessed as a matter of law affects its legal treatment. It also has practical consequences for how that thing can be transferred, whether and how certain types of security can be granted over it and the proprietary remedies available to protect it.
Under the current law a “thing in possession” is, simply, any object that can be physically possessed. This category includes assets which are “tangible, moveable and visible and of which possession can be taken". All personal things are either in possession or action. The law knows no tertium quid [“third thing”] between the two. -- The Law of Personal Property (2nd ed 2019) para 1-016.
A chattel is an object that is capable of being owned as personal property. In the context of personal property, these types of objects are known as “chattels personal” and can either be tangible or intangible. Tangible personal property means that the chattel has a physical embodiment and are capable of being in someone’s physical possession. Intangible personal property refers to something that does not have a physical embodiment, however, it does represent something of value. Personal property may be classified as either a fixture or a chattel. The vaulted Digital Object is chattel which exists as personal property and hence is afforded the same legal protections and title as any other form of tangible property.
A chain of title is the sequence of historical transfers of title to property. It is a valuable tool to identify and document past owners of property and serves as a property's historical ownership timeline. The unbroken "chain" runs from the present owner back to the original owner of the property to ensure guaranteed title to the currency possessor of the property. There cannot exist any title over property without "provenance". Legal title represents actual ownership of property as when the property has been bought, the seller paid in full and a deed or title is legally executed.
In essence the vaulting process is transformative, the vaulting process outweighs the other fair use copyright factors because "Digital vaulting provides a significant benefit to the public". -- The US Ninth Circuit explained this in the Perfect 10 case.
Legal title is the actual ownership of the property. A title deed is a statement that only pertains to the rightful ownership over a particular property. The vaulted object possession, coupled with provable ownership and provence describes the person with legal title. Legal title grants true ownership of the property, and all that this entails – the bundle of rights that comes with property ownership. Legal title is a perfected ownership interest that's enforceable by law.
Ownership of property refers to the legal right to exclude others from the specific thing owned. Aside from the right to exclude others from using property, ownership rights often include the right to possess, to use, to transfer, and to commercialise the property. A property owner with legal title can take legal action against parties that attempt to infringe upon one's ownership rights.
The vaulted object, is the legal document which conveys title in the property from one person to another, along with the associated ownership provence. As such it can be subject to inheritance law claims and bailment.
A transfer of a digital object has significant legal and practical consequences, including in relation to the legal requirements for an effective transfer. The distinction between things in possession and things in action is important in this respect. Delivery of possession is historically legally effective to transfer a thing in possession, but delivery of possession is not possible for intangibles or things in action. Things in action are usually transferred by assignment or novation and often are predicated upon specific and local statue to give effect to the action..
The transfer of a vaulted digital object is legally achieved via a) the transfer of possession of the digital object and the b) transfer of legal title over the vaulted object via the embedded Deed. The digital object contains a complete and publicly verifiable history, of title provenance from its point of legal immobilisation.
Space Time Continuum...
Because space consists of 3 dimensions, and time is 1-dimensional, space-time must, therefore, be a 4-dimensional object. It is believed to be a 'continuum' because so far as we know, there are no missing points in space or instants in time, and both can be subdivided without any apparent limit in size or duration. So, physicists now routinely consider our world to be embedded in this 4 dimensional Space-Time continuum, and all events, places, moments in history, actions and so on are described in terms of their location in Space-Time. Space-time does not evolve, it simply exists. When we examine a particular object from the stand point of its space-time representation, every particle is located along its world-line. This is a spaghetti-like line that stretches from the past to the future showing the spatial location of the particle at every instant in time. This world-line exists as a complete object which may be sliced here and there so that you can see where the particle is located in space at a particular instant. Once you determine the complete world line of a particle from the forces acting upon it, you have 'solved' for its complete history. This world-line does not change with time, but simply exists as a timeless object.
The Sentinel Proof-of-Existence makes use of spacetime to create a single concreate space-time continuum for each valued object.
The important common law requirement for a deed is the sealing, as this provides evidence of the solemnity of the document and the seriousness of the intention of the parties. It is not necessary under common law for the deed to be signed or witnessed. The traditional method of sealing a document is through the stamping of a blob of hot red wax with an imprint at the foot of the document.
Nowadays, it is sufficient if it can be proven that the document is sealed against all alterations and is expressed to be sealed by the parties, even though no actual wax or paper seal has been affixed.
Whilst the days of official seals, sealing wax and parchments are well behind us, it is telling that ‘deeds’ have survived as a document more robust than a contract or agreement. Deeds do not rely upon any party getting consideration to be enforceable (as with agreements). After a millennia of human history, Deeds transferring Legal Title over property are still recorded on paper and are still signed and witnessed in the traditional sense.
The difference between a Deed and an ordinary Agreement is the ceremony that is attached to the deed process.. Because of this execution process, deeds have an elevated status above a simple agreement and the enforceability of promises given under a deed are recognised beyond the terms applying to ordinary agreements. Without the Ceremony of the deed execution process, one is left with a standard Agreement. The deed execution process requires the parties to a deed, to confirm that the deed had not only been signed, and sealed, but was also being delivered so as to become effective.
For 'natural persons' for a deed to be binding under general law, the deed must:
be in writing;
have a seal affixed to the document; and
be delivered to the other party to the deed.
Seal
The act of affixing a "Digital Signature" to the embedded digital object , legally Seals the deed against all future alterations (without the need for a witness). Each new Title natural person, affixes his Seal as a counter signature, to the previous province chain of Legal Title. The provenance of Legal Title is publicly available and independently verifiable by any relying party.
Delivery
Delivery refers to the date when a court will consider that a deed is effective, and hence ownership has been accepted by the new possessor of the Deed. Once a deed has been executed and delivered, it is binding and cannot be revoked unless either the parties agree to this (by way of a further deed).
The point of delivery is the point in time, as affixed (in UTC), with the Deed, indicating when the new owner has executed the Deed.
The Digital Property Deed is a "Signed, Sealed and Delivered" and hence transfers Legal Title over the legally immobilised (vaulted) digital object.
Property and possessory rights are explicitly protected by the law of torts and by criminal laws and are given further protection by rebuttable presumptions in the common law as to statutory interpretation, under the principle of legality .
In Australia, property rights find protection from encroachment by the state within the Australian Constitution, through the principle of legality at common law, and, to some extent, in international law. There is no broader constitutional prohibition on the making of laws that interfere with vested property rights. The High Court has taken a wide view of the concept of ‘property’ in interpreting s 51(xxxi) of the Constitution, reading it as ‘a general term’: ‘It means any tangible or intangible thing which the law protects under the name of property’ .
Property and law are born together, and die together. Before laws were made there was no property; take away laws, and property ceases to exist, and the law has no purpose in society.
Land originally granted by the Crown was subsequently held and dealt with under the English general law system of tenure through the issue of a deed of conveyance. All subsequent dealings with the land required verification of the validity of the deed under transfer by searching (at each and every transaction) the previous chain of history of the deed for a period of up to 30 years preceding the transfer, to ensure there was proof of a good root of title and that there were no legal impediments to the effectiveness of the deed transfer. In order to achieve this result each and every transfer of title was recorded on the title deed that was physically passed between owners via the act of possession of the Title Deed itself.
It was soon realized that there was no guarantee that all the interests in the land had been uncovered through the records embedded in the Title deed recordings and/or searching, and that previous encumbrances, such as outstanding land taxes and defects and deficiencies could easily pass to a new owner. Title Deeds were established under various Acts of Parliaments to protect purchasers and mortgagees through the registration of all conveyancing transactions at a single State–controlled repository, thus simplifying searching of land records and associated encumbrances for further dealings with parcels of land. Its key feature is that it captures all interests in a property, including transfers, mortgages, leases, easements, covenants, resumptions and other rights in a single Land Title which, once registered with the State by a Recorder of Titles, is guaranteed correct by the State.
Most deeds must contain several essential elements to be legally valid:
They must be in writing. While most deeds are completed on printed forms, there is no legal requirement that any specific form is used as long as the essential elements are included.
The grantor must have the legal capacity to transfer the property and the grantee must be capable of receiving the grant of the property. A person who is competent to make a valid contract is considered competent to be a grantor.
The grantor and grantee must be identified in such a way as to be ascertainable.
The property must be adequately described.
Operative words of conveyance must be present.
The deed must be signed by the grantor or grantors if the property is owned by more than one person.
The deed must be legally delivered to the grantee or to someone acting on the grantee's behalf.
The deed must be accepted by the grantee. Typically, deeds are accepted by the grantee but in certain circumstances, the grantee could reject delivery of the deed.
In both Anglo-American and civil law the sale of a movable is both a contract and a conveyance. In both Anglo-American and French law the contract also serves to transfer the title to the thing unless the parties agree otherwise. German law, on the other hand, following Roman law, requires that there be a handing over of the thing from the seller to the buyer before title may pass. Indeed, in German law title to the thing will pass even if there is no valid contract of sale, so long as the parties intend to transfer ownership of the thing. All systems hold as a basic principle that one cannot transfer more rights in a thing than one holds. Property Deeds, are the legal documents that transfer title from one person to another.
At common law, the requirements for executing a deed are that it must be in writing, sealed and delivered to the other party.
Hence while deeds of title do not require registration , recording deeds to real property, subsequent to delivery and acceptance, in a public register makes the deed a public document. Recording them in a public register acts as defacto notice to all third parties as to ownership in the property. Note that a bona fide purchaser is one who has reasonable cause to believe that title is vested in him or her, e.g. either by mistake or fraud, a person granted a false deed to the bona fide purchaser. In certain circumstances a bona fide purchaser may even have superior rights to the property over the actual title holder. If one records the deed, then there can be no bona fide purchasers (unless one acts oneself to void one’s deed) since notice of true ownership is given to the world. Thus, recording increases the protection of the deed.
The person in whose name the property stands on the register is the legal owner of the land; or, in less scientific, but no less accurate, language, the property always goes with the certificate. For example, let us suppose that John Smith is the registered owner of a property, and that he wishes to convey it to Thomas Jones. He executes a deed of the property, as now, to Jones; but that does not pass title to the property. He gives Jones also his certificate of title to the property. Upon acceptance of the transfer of Title from John Smith, Thomas Jones submits John Smiths certificate or "proof of possession" to the registrar who acting upon the authority of the Title, issues a new "proof of possession" or certificate to Thomas Jones. The legal title of the property is now with Thomas Jones. The register purports to deal solely with the legal title of the property via the issuance of a "proof of exitance of a property Title with guaranteed ownership province to from the point of the property creation or legal immobilisation. In essence the registry provides an independent means to verify the holder of the "proof" or certificate is the current owner of the legal title as nominated in the property Title ownership chain.
The fact that the title to property is always in a registered owner makes a Statute of Limitations unnecessary; for as no party could acquire an apparent but invalid title to which after the lapse of time his right ought to be protected, the whole justification for a title by lapse of time is lacking. The devolution of property upon the owner's death is much simplified. The current possessor of the property title, must also provide a "proof" or certificate that the property Title is the current Title, and all other claims of Title must temporally precede the claim.
This is the function offered by the "Sentinel Service" as described above..
The Title Deed, has universal application to high value collectables, or anythign of value, in both the physical and digital world.
Legal Title only exists via Law, there is no "natural" property rights anytime in human history..
The digital Title Deed, coupled with an immutable ownership provence chain bound to the "Object" restores confidence in the ability for high value object to legally transfer in both possession and legal ownership, including property rights, whcih can be fully enforceable in a court of law.
Each physical object is legally codified as a unique object, attested by independent parties to the Title Deed via an attached "chip" to each physical object, whcih can be verified by a modern mobile phone.